![]() | Quakers were at the forefront of the movement to boycott goods produced by slave labour. Going beyond boycotts, the “Free Produce” Movement, comparable with today’s Fairtrade movement, marketed goods wholly produced by free labour. Many Friends, especially in the early years of the movement, took these steps simply as a matter of conscience. For example Elias Hicks, in his Observations on the Slavery of the Africans and their Descendants and on the use of the products of their labour, wrote: “May we not be led to conclude, that no man who is convinced of the cruelty and injustice of holding a fellow-creature in slavery, can traffic in, or make use of the produce of a slave’s labour, believing it to be such, without criminating himself”. |
But later Elizabeth Heyrick, in her Immediate Not Gradual Abolition, had no misgivings about boycott as a means of coercion:
“ABSTINENCE FROM THE USE OF WEST INDIAN PRODUCTIONS (her capitals!), sugar, especially, in the cultivation of which slave labour is chiefly occupied … … would, at once, give the deathblow to West Indian slavery. When there was no longer a market for the productions of slave labour, then, and not till then, will the slaves be emancipated”.
Consider other early Quaker Boycotts, and the tension between conscience and coercion and between Prophets and Reconcilers.
Help for Palestinians | Negotiations | Nuclear-free Middle East | Prophets and Reconcilers | Time Line |
---|